| Changes in this year's deer regulations make it easier and less expensive than ever to put venison in the freezer. (Missouri Dept. of Conservation photo) |
The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service will send you information about the life story of banded ducks and geese if you report the band number.
JEFFERSON CITY - Waterfowl hunters who are lucky enough to shoot ducks or geese wearing leg bands proudly display the trophies on duck call lanyards. But did you know that wearing a leg band without reporting it defeats the purpose of banding? Did you know that by reporting the band number you can learn the bird's story?
Banding is one of wildlife biologists' most important tools for learning about waterfowl numbers, distribution, lifespan and behavior. It is, however, a little like casting bread on the water hoping it will come back to you.
Each year state and federal officials across Canada and the United States put leg bands on thousands of ducks and geese captured in net traps, then release the birds. For the vast majority of the banded birds, that's the last that's ever heard of them. They die of natural causes or are eaten by predators or killed by cold or disease. But every year a small percentage of marked birds are taken by hunters.
"That's when the payoff comes," said Resource Scientist Dave Graber, a waterfowl specialist with the Missouri Department of Conservation. "If the hunter reads the inscription etched on the band and reports it, that bird becomes a data point in a vast collection of information. Over the years, those data points accumulate and we get a clearer picture of where birds go, when they go there, how long they live and how many there are."
Without leg band reports, Graber and other waterfowl managers would find it much more difficult to set hunting seasons and bag limits, plan habitat restoration and preservation programs and ensure that troubled waterfowl species, such as pintail, canvasback and lesser scaup, survive.
To repay hunters who report band information, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service sends them information about where and when the bird was banded.
Every band bears a unique serial number and information about how to report its recovery. Reporting can be done by calling 800/327-2263. You can also write to Bird Banding Laboratory, 12100 Beech Forest Road, Suite 4037, Laurel, MD 20708-4037 or report online at www.pwrc.usgs.gov/bbl/ .
The Web site also has information about the history of bird banding, types of bands and the uses of bird-band data.
- Jim Low -
Hunters bagged 3,195 fewer turkeys during the fall firearms season.
JEFFERSON CITY--Hunters bagged 11,292 wild turkeys during Missouri's two-week fall firearms turkey season, falling 3,195 short of the 2002 fall harvest.
The 2003 fall harvest included 5,450 adult birds and 5,842 juveniles. High counties were Laclede with 314, Wright with 232 and St. Clair with 224. Regional harvest totals were: Northwest, 2,275; Northeast, 1,863; Southwest, 1,589; Kansas City, 1,582; Central, 1,353; Ozark, 1,323; Southeast, 700 and St. Louis, 607.
Fall turkey season opened Oct. 13 and ran through Oct. 26.
- Jim Low -
| Hunters should wear safety harnesses while climbing into and out of tree stands, not just when sitting in stands. (Missouri Dept. of Conservation photo) |
Liberated bait can have devastating effects on fish populations.
ST. CHARLES, Mo. – Missouri is under attack by aliens bent on destruction. Luckily, some Missourians are alert, ready to report alien landings to the Missouri Department of Conservation.
The Conservation Department?
That's right. The Conservation Department is on the front lines of the battle to protect the Show-Me State from aliens--alien wildlife species that is. Don't bother looking for these aliens at Area 51 in New Mexico. Try the nearest bait shop. That's where one vigilant Missourian spotted a rusty crayfish.
Instead of panicking and running for his life, the sentinel called Resource Scientist Bob DiStefano at the Resource Science Center in Columbia. He traced the dreaded critter to a bait company in Monroe County.
"The person who called us knew what a rusty crayfish looks like and he knew it was potential trouble for Missouri," said DiStefano. "We really appreciated his quick action."
Rusty crayfish (Orconectes rusticus) are bad news because they are what scientists call "invasive." Removed from their original areas, without normal population controls such as diseases, parasites and specialized predators, invasive exotics can run rampant. That has been true of the rusty crayfish in other areas.
The medium-sized crayfish originally was found only in the Ohio River Basin. In recent years, however, the species has turned up in lakes or streams in 18 other states and Canada. Outside its original range, it has caused a variety of ecological problems.
One problem is the rusty's appetite for fresh-water snails and mussels. In some areas, it has decimated native frogs, plants and crustaceans, undermining the natural food chain. In extreme cases, it has caused numbers of popular sport fish species to crash.
Another common result when rusty crayfish invade new areas is the elimination of other crayfish species through competition. This reduces biological diversity.
"This is not a problem we need," said DiStefano. "Sport fish are the basis for a big chunk of Missouri's tourism industry. And while losing biological diversity may not have any immediately noticeable economic effects, it eventually takes a toll. Biological systems that lack diversity are more susceptible to ecological disasters. You can't undermine the integrity of Missouri's aquatic ecosystem without paying a price eventually. We are very serious about keeping the rusty crayfish and other exotic species out of Missouri."
One tool the Conservation Department uses to keep the rusty crayfish and other unwanted animals where they belong is the Approved Aquatic Species List. It is illegal for fish farms and bait producers to sell species that aren't on the list. But enforcing such rules is difficult.
"The bait wholesaler who sold the rusty crayfish to the St. Charles bait shop did not know they were doing wrong," said DiStefano, "and we don't think the bait shop knew either. The bait wholesaler has been very cooperative with us, and I am convinced that he really wants to do the right thing. He fully recognizes that if he helps introduce a potentially dangerous exotic crayfish to Missouri waters, he could be hurting his own livelihood and the fishing that he loves."
Another example of exotic species invading Missouri is the dramatic increase of Asian carp species. No one knows yet what burgeoning numbers of silver and bighead carp in the Missouri and Mississippi rivers will do to native fish, such as the ever-popular flathead, blue and channel catfish. The hefty carp already have affected boaters on the river, who must be extra careful to avoid being injured when the Asian carp make spectacular, airborne jumps to escape approaching water craft.
Asian carp have entered Missouri from a variety of sources. Rusty crayfish usually are spread by anglers who buy them in one area and bring left-over bait back home with them. DiStefano said this makes anglers a critical link in the effort to keep the crayfish out of the state.
"I know it seems wasteful to destroy crayfish at the end of a fishing trip," he said, "but emptying your bait bucket into the lake or stream can have disastrous results. The same goes for minnows, worms and other commercial bait. "If you don't know where it came from originally, there's a chance it is an invasive exotic. Better to be safe and put them in your trash for a trip to the landfill."
Wisconsin has experienced such serious damage from exotic crayfish that it has banned the use of live crayfish as bait. Arizona won't even allow crayfish to be transported through the state. Some fisheries professionals are calling for a national ban on the use of crayfish as bait.
"I don't know if it will come to that in Missouri," said DiStefano. "I hope not. Anglers can help by destroying unused crayfish after each trip."
- Jim Low -
| Hunter Skills University gives mid-Missouri youths a chance to practice what they learn in hunter education classes. (Missouri Dept. of Conservation photo) |
Winner also wins free trip to accept awards.
JEFFERSON CITY -- Young Missouri artists have a chance to reap cash and travel rewards by participating in a national art contest sponsored by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
Artistic kids will be interested in the Fish and Wildlife Service's Federal Junior Duck Stamp Conservation and Design Program. The competition begins with state contests. The agency awards ribbons for first, second and third places, and honorable mentions in each of four age groups--K- 3, grades 4-6, grades 7-9, and grades 10-12. Everyone who enters gets a certificate.
The entry selected as best of show in each state advances to the national competition. The national winner receives $4,000 and a free trip to Washington D.C. with his or her art teacher and one parent to attend the adult Federal Duck Stamp Contest. The winning artwork is made into the Federal Junior Duck Stamp. The money raised from sales of this stamp goes for conservation awards and for scholarships for kids who enter the contest.
The winner of the entry placing 2nd receives $2,000 and $1,000 is awarded to the 3rd-place winner.
Big Muddy National Wildlife Refuge administers Missouri's Junior Duck Stamp contest. For entry packets or for more information about the contest, contact Tim Haller, 4200 New Haven Road, Columbia, MO 65201, 800/611-1826, or email
The Federal Junior Duck Stamp Conservation and Design Program is a dynamic arts curriculum designed to teach wetlands and waterfowl conservation to students in kindergarten through high school. This program incorporates scientific and wildlife management principles into a visual arts curriculum.
This non-traditional pairing of subjects brings new interest to both science and the arts. It crosses cultural, ethnic, social, and geographic boundaries to teach greater awareness of our nation's natural resources. This benefits not only ducks, but all migratory birds, including neotropical migratory songbirds, and hundreds of other plants and animals that depend on wetlands habitat for their survival.
The art competition requires an understanding of anatomy and environmental science and can be a valid barometer of a student's grasp of these topics. It also offers a way to express that knowledge outside the traditional science classroom. And for all students, it offers an opportunity to experience the beauty and diversity of wildlife.
Proceeds from the sale of Junior Duck Stamps (which cost $5) support conservation education by providing awards and scholarships for the students, teachers, and schools that participate in the program.
State agencies that sell Junior Duck Stamps may use their share of the proceeds for designated conservation purposes. For a free copy of the curriculum guide: duckstamps@fws.gov.
- Jim Low -
Cash and trip awarded for artwork that best illustrates benefits of trees.
JEFFERSON CITY -- The Missouri Department of Conservation and the Missouri Community Forestry Council are calling on all fifth-grade classrooms in Missouri to showcase their artistic talents by creating posters for the 2004 National Arbor Day Poster Contest.
The theme of the contest is "Trees are Terrific. Through the contest, students will learn about the importance of trees to the environment and how they can make a difference.
Each school's winning poster advances to the state competition. The state winner receives a $50 savings bond. What's more, the Conservation Department plants a 6- to 12-foot tree on the grounds of the winner's school. The winner also gets to attend Gov. Bob Holden's signing of the Missouri Arbor Day Proclamation at the State Capitol in Jefferson City and enter the national contest.
The deadline for state Arbor Day contest submissions is Feb. 13. Packets with contest information will be sent to all fifth-grade art teachers. Teachers will receive free curriculum materials, including in-depth lesson plans, hands-on activities and contest information. Any fifth-grade teacher can obtain a packet by contacting Donna Baldwin, P.O. Box 180, Jefferson City, MO 65102, Donna.Baldwin@mdc.mo.gov.
The national winner will be announced on National Arbor Day, April 30, 2004. The winner will receive a $1,000 savings bond. The winner's teacher will receive $200 for classroom materials.
- Jim Low -
| CWD Monitoring Sites at Deer Check Stations. |
Missouri's 2002 hunting accident reports point the way to safe days afield.
JEFFERSON CITY - "Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it."
Philosopher George Santayana probably wasn't thinking of hunting accidents when he penned that famous saying. However, Rick Flint, hunter education program coordinator for the Missouri Department of Conservation, says hunters would do well to heed the warning. Year after year, they make the same mistakes.
"If people could see how history repeats itself in our hunting accident reports and see first-hand the suffering those mistakes create, we could cut hunting accidents in half overnight."
Flint, who has been investigating hunting accidents for more than a decade, has seen his share of suffering. But you don't have to look any farther than last year's hunting accident summary to find the lessons hunters need to learn.
In 2002, the Conservation Department recorded 36 firearms-related hunting accidents. No one died in those accidents, but several people suffered serious or disabling injuries.
Nine of last year's accidents, exactly one-quarter of the total, were self-inflicted. You might think it would be difficult to shoot yourself unintentionally, but accident reports show a surprising variety of ways it can happen.
The first two accidents of 2002 were self-inflicted. On Jan. 6 of that year, a .45 cal. pistol fell from an unsecured holster of a 22-year-old Independence man who was hunting deer near Strasburg. Seeing that it had dirt in the barrel, he tried to clear the pistol and it discharged, piercing the palm of his left hand.
On Jan. 12, 2002, a 14-year-old St. James resident was hunting crows in Maries County. He put his 20 gauge shotgun down to cross a fallen tree. That was a wise move. But when his hunting companion handed him the loaded shotgun the young hunter grasped it by its barrel. Moments later, the gun discharged a load of No. 6 lead pellets into his right forearm.
On Oct. 3, 2002, a 32-year-old St. Joseph man was returning from bowhunting for deer in Buchanan County when he found a .25 cal. pistol along a railroad track. As he tried to clean mud off the pistol, it discharged into his left hand.
On Nov. 17, a 16-year-old Stafford resident climbed into her tree stand to hunt deer in Lawrence County. Her companion handed her a loaded .357 cal. lever-action rifle. She lost her grip on the rifle, and as it fell the exposed hammer struck her metal tree stand, causing the rifle to discharge. The bullet stuck her right forearm.
A lever-action rifle also figured in a Nov. 22, 2002, accident that involved a 24-year-old Keokuk, Iowa, man. He fell about 5 feet while climbing out of his tree stand with the loaded .30-30. Again, the rifle discharged, and the bullet struck the hunter's left leg below the knee. He was able to crawl to his vehicle, where his father found him.
As seen in these incidents, most hunting accidents are associated with the most popular types of hunting -- deer, rabbits and squirrels. That is predictable. More hunting means more hunting accidents, just as more automobile driving means more traffic accidents. However, turkey hunting accounts for a disproportionate number of accidents every year.
That is partly because turkey hunters do their best to become invisible while imitating the calls of their quarry. The majority of turkey hunting accidents fall into the category of "victim mistaken for game." Last year, eight of 11 turkey hunting accidents were of this kind.
Turkey hunters can take measures to avoid such accidents. Ultimately, though, mistaking another person for game is the shooter's fault. A case from April 28, 2002 makes this clear. A 39-year-old Belton man had finished hunting in Cass County and was walking back to his vehicle wearing a hunter-orange vest and with an orange vest thrown over one shoulder. He saw another hunter and waved. A few moments later the other hunter shot him.
The only thing the victim in this accident did wrong was to wave instead of shouting a greeting. Movement can be misinterpreted by a hunter who is intent on finding a turkey. Another case illustrates this fact.
On April 22, 2002, a 55-year-old Belton man was hunting on national forest land in Texas County. He later said he heard what he thought was a young turkey gobbler. Then he thought he saw a turkey feeding near a tree. Then he thought he saw a red turkey head and fired his 12 gauge shotgun, striking the victim, in the head and right shoulder with No. 4 lead pellets.
"This case is very typical," said Flint. "The victim was wearing camouflage clothing, but shooter's desire to find a turkey clouded his judgment enough that he was convinced he saw a turkey."
Turkey hunters aren't the only ones who mistake other hunters for game. On Nov. 16, 2002, a 37-year-old Queen City man was deer hunting with his cousin in Schuyler County. They saw a deer go into some brush. The shooter thought he saw a deer coming out of the brush 30 or 40 yards away and fired his .30-30 rifle. His target turned out to be his cousin's brown pants. The bullet hit the victim in the right thigh above the knee. This incident was the only one in 2002 where a deer hunter mistook another hunter for game.
Most of the other accidents that happened during the 2002 deer season were the result of defective firearms or careless gun handling. Three involved victims who were out of sight of the shooter, moved into the line of fire or were injured when the shooter fired at moving deer and they were in the way.
This last type of accident, "shooter swinging on game," is more common in other types of hunting, especially rabbits and game birds. Last year this type of accident accounted for eight incidents, second only to "victim mistaken for game." The cases included one waterfowl hunting accident, one dove, one squirrel, one deer, two quail and two rabbit. These included the last hunting accident of the year.
The victim, a 17-year-old Westphalia man, was one of five hunters in a party hunting in Cole County Dec. 29, 2002. They had surrounded a brush pile and the victim was about 30 yards away, directly across and in plain sight of the shooter, a 25-year-old Mokane resident. When a rabbit bolted from the brush pile, the shooter fired his 12-gauge shotgun at the rabbit, striking the victim, his cousin, in the legs, abdomen and chest with approximately 60 No. 6 shot pellets.
Nearly a third of 2002 hunting accidents involved friends shooting hunting companions. In five cases, the shooter was the father, son or brother of the victim. On Nov. 25, three days before Thanksgiving Day last year, a 73-year-old Greenville man taking part in a deer drive fired two rifled slugs from his 12 gauge shotgun at a running deer. One of the slugs struck his 39-year-old son in the left side of his abdomen and exited through his left buttock.
Illegal activity sometimes figures in hunting accidents, too. Two days before Christmas last year, two Chadwick men, ages 36 and 17, were hunting deer in Christian County. Deer season had been closed for more than a week. They wounded a deer, and in the process of pursuing the deer the older man fired two shots from a .22 cal. magnum rifle. After the first shot, the younger man jumped up and stepped in front of the rifle. The second shot entered his head from behind on the right side and exited on the front, right side.
Twenty-six of the 2002 hunting accidents involved known shooters and injuries that were not self-inflicted. The Conservation Commission has revoked the hunting privileges of 18 of those shooters. Three other cases are pending final Commission action.
Flint said hunters could prevent nearly all hunting accidents by obeying the following rules:
--Always keep firearms pointed in a safe direction.
--Keep firearms unloaded except when hunting or preparing to shoot.
--Treat every firearm as if it were loaded.
--Be sure of your target before you pull the trigger.
--Never point a gun at anything you do not want to shoot.
--Never climb or jump with a loaded firearm.
--Never shoot at a flat, hard surface or water.
--Store firearms and ammunition separately and under lock and key.
--Avoid alcohol and other drugs before and while handling firearms.
- Jim Low -
| Don Willis can hunt quail in his own back yard, thanks to the bobwhite education he got from the Missouri Department of Conservation. (Missouri Dept. of Conservation photo) |
Water, food and a larger number of young birds could make the 2003-2004 waterfowl hunting season one to remember.
JEFFERSON CITY - Six months ago, Dave Graber was preparing duck hunters for bad news. Now he says the 2003-2004 waterfowl hunting season could be one of the best in recent memory. It's the kind of reversal that every wildlife manager likes to make.
Graber is a resource scientist at the Missouri Department of Conservation's resource science center in Columbia. His specialty is waterfowl. Each spring, he looks at the number of ducks and geese returning north to nest and the number of ponds, which are an indication of breeding habitat. Those statistics help him form a picture of the coming waterfowl hunting season.
This winter the outlook wasn't bright. Waterfowl nesting success was fair to poor last year, so there were fewer birds to carry on. Furthermore, below-normal precipitation in the northern prairie region -- the central United States and Canadian duck factory -- had reduced available nesting habitat. Based on these facts, it seemed possible that declining duck numbers would trigger shorter hunting seasons and smaller bag limits.
Then came April, and it came in wet. Above-average precipitation on the northern prairies nearly doubled the number of seasonal ponds, and by the time ducks arrived, they found an abundance of nesting habitat.
"It was the kind of spring you pray for but seldom get," said Graber. "No matter how many ducks you have, without suitable habitat, they don't nest. By the same token, you can have fewer birds, but if the habitat is favorable, you can get a bumper crop of young ducks. That's what happened this year."
Aerial surveys conducted in May showed a 160 percent increase in the total number of breeding ducks compared to last year and 25 percent above the long-term average. Brood surveys conducted in July showed a 21 percent increase in numbers of young ducks from 2002. Overall, breeding duck numbers increased from 31.2 million last year to 36.2 million.
Among the best news to come out of this year's waterfowl surveys is a substantial increase in pintail numbers. Last year, breeding pintails numbered only 1.8 million, down from a historic high of more than 10 million in the 1950s. This year's number was 2,558,000. That 43 percent increase raises hopes for a long-awaited pintail recovery. But with the species still 39 percent below long-term population numbers, it still has a long way to go.
Mallards, always the mainstay of Missouri duck hunters, were similar to last year, keeping them slightly above the long-term population average.
Other duck species whose breeding numbers increased this year include: Northern shoveler, 56 percent and blue-winged teal, 31 percent. Green-winged teal stood at 2.7 million the second-largest number on record.
The increase in breeding pairs of ducks and geese and the resulting increase in broods of waterfowl counted later in the summer prompted the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to extend liberal hunting regulations for another season. That's welcome news to duck hunters.
Also welcome will be the presence of a larger proportion of young birds among this fall's migrants. Young birds that have never been shot at are less wary of hunters.
Graber said this spring's abundant rain alone wouldn't have been enough to spur a waterfowl recovery. Habitat preservation and restoration efforts of government agencies, the USDA Farm Bill, the North American Wetland Conservation Act and citizen organizations, such as Ducks Unlimited, laid the groundwork for the recovery.
If you don't hunt waterfowl, you probably will be surprised to learn that a bumper crop of ducks doesn't guarantee a good hunting season. Missouri hunters get a shot at ducks only when they are passing through the Show-Me State on their way south. In years when large numbers of ducks linger here, hunters have ample opportunity to hunt them.
Last year's duck season was a good one. Missouri's 31,000 active waterfowl hunters bagged approximately 393,000 ducks. That's fewer than the 461,000 taken during the 2001-2002 season. However, it's important to keep those numbers in perspective. Last year was the sixth in a row in which Missouri hunters topped the previous record of 311,600 set in 1975. To say that Missouri duck hunters have been spoiled by their recent good luck is an understatement.
In some years, ducks stay in Missouri only a few days then leapfrog south, leaving hunters empty-handed. The difference between good and bad years often hinges on habitat. If ducks find lots of food and water in Missouri, they hang around. If not, they move on.
Graber said food supplies are adequate to keep ducks in Missouri when they arrive. Native plants, such as smartweed and millet, produced average to above-average seed crops. Agricultural crops such as corn, soybeans, sorghum and wheat have done moderately well along rivers and around wetland areas, even in drought-stricken northwestern Missouri.
Recent rains have helped set the stage for a good waterfowl season, too. Ducks need standing water to rest and take advantage of available foods. Graber said the water levels at most managed wetland areas are good. One exception is Nodaway Valley Conservation Area. Low water in the Nodaway River has hampered efforts to flood wetland pools there.
With normal rainfall between now and the opening of duck season, Missouri hunters could be in duck heaven. On the other hand, with below-average rainfall ducks could be in Arkansas before you know it.
So if Missouri gets normal precipitation for the next two months, hunters will have a field day, right? Not necessarily. All the food and standing water in the world won't help hunters if ducks don't arrive early in the season or an early cold spell locks up shallow-water habitat. A few birds may linger on big rivers and reservoirs, but the rest will head for warmer regions.
"Ducks are creatures of wind and water, so duck hunting will always be a weather-driven game," said Graber. "Successful hunters are inveterate weather watchers. They know when a cold front is pushing down from the upper Midwest, and they do whatever it takes to be in the marsh when the front reaches Missouri. A day can make the difference between a once-in-a-lifetime hunt and empty skies."
Missouri's 2003-2004 duck season will run for 60 days in each of the five management zones. In the North and Swan Lake zones the season will open Oct. 25 and run through Dec. 23. In the Middle and Southeast zones, opening and closing dates will be Nov. 1 and Dec. 30, and in the South Zone the season will run from Nov. 22 through Jan. 20.
The season on pintails and canvasbacks will be Oct. 25 through Nov. 23 in the North and Swan Lake Zones, Nov. 1 through Nov. 30 in the Middle and Southeast zones and Nov. 22 through Dec. 21 in the South Zone
The bag limit on ducks will continue at six daily and 12 in possession. As in recent years, hunters can take up to four mallards daily, including no more than two hens. The limit on pintails, canvasbacks, black ducks and hooded mergansers is one each. Bag limits for other ducks include three scaup, two wood ducks and two redheads. The possession limit is twice the daily limit.
Youths will have an opportunity to hunt ducks before adults hit the marshes, lakes and streams. The Youth Waterfowl Season will be Oct. 18 and 19 in the North and Swan Lake zones, Oct. 25 and 26 in the Middle and Southeast zones and Nov. 15 and 16 in the South Zone.
Participants in Youth Hunting Days must be age 15 or younger and must be accompanied by a licensed adult at least 18 years of age who will not be permitted to hunt ducks. Adults need not be licensed if the youth possesses a valid hunter education certificate card.
Full details of waterfowl hunting regulations are contained in the 2003-2004 Waterfowl Hunting Digest, available wherever hunting permits are sold. For information about food and water conditions at public wetland areas, visit http://www.conservation.state.mo.us/hunt/wtrfowl/ and click on "updated 2003status of Missouri wetland areas."
- Jim Low -