Comparing notes after the firearms deer season, agents had lots of good things to say about the new system for checking deer via telephone or computer.
JEFFERSON CITY-Missouri's new automated system for registering deer and turkey kills gives conservation agents more time to spend checking for violations and a better handle on poachers' activities. That is the consensus that emerged from a recent meeting of agents from around the state.
Each January, regional and district supervisors in the Conservation Department's Protection Division meet to conduct a post-mortem of the recently ended deer season. The meeting allows them to compare notes about how hunters handled regulation changes, special challenges agents faced, and how new regulations affected the job of enforcing game laws.
The agenda for this year's deer-season wrap-up included a discussion of Telecheck. The consensus was positive, with supervisors from all regions reporting that Telecheck gave them much faster and freer access to deer-check records. Instead of having to visit multiple check stations and check written records at each, they had instantaneous access to records from office and laptop computers.
"The information we are getting today from Telecheck is a great addition to what we get from informants," said one agent.
Protection Central Region Supervisor Tom Strother said several of his agents told him Telecheck helped make 2005 the most efficient deer season they have ever worked. He said the violation most often discovered using the Telecheck system involved hunters who killed bucks and checked them as does.
Strother's district includes several counties where hunting regulations prohibited taking antlered deer that did not have at least four points on one side. He said ethical hunters were impressed when agents showed up at their houses to verify that the 6- or 7-point bucks they Telechecked had at least four points on one side. Violators were impressed, too, but not in a positive way.
In the St. Louis region, agents said many of the cases they made using Telecheck involved people shooting a deer and then buying a permit. It was easy for agents to pick up this violation due to short time between purchase and checking.
Protection Division Administrator Dennis Steward said agents who began an investigation based on Telecheck information often uncovered numerous other violations, such as spotlighting, road hunting, illegally taken bucks, over-limits and nonresidents hunting on resident permits. "Folks who are inclined to violate one regulation often violate others," he said.
On the whole, agents said people liked the new deer-checking system, though many hunters were concerned that it would make it easier to kill deer illegally. This didn't seem to be the case, however. One supervisor said an agent spent some time spot-checking deer at a meat-packing house, comparing deer with information that hunters gave when Telechecking their kills. He did not find a single hunter who had abused the system.
Nevertheless, a few unethical hunters did try to take unfair advantage. Many of these poachers failed to understand how quickly agents would be able to check on suspicious records. Strother commented that it was surprising how many hunters bought permits at 4 p.m. but still managed to kill deer before dark.
Agents looked into all those cases. One involved a woman who bought three deer hunting permits and minutes later checked three deer. In another case, a hunter checked five deer on one permit.
Agents generally felt that Telecheck allowed them to make better use of their time. Those in southwest Missouri reported that hunting pressure was down, but arrests were up, thanks to information provided by Telecheck.
"Although conservation agents have become much more confident with the Telecheck system, we all recognize that any checking system can be abused," said Steward. "The old check station system was not perfect, and we all know some violations occurred if a hunter was so inclined. Some folks will try to get away with breaking the law with Telecheck, too."
Steward noted that hunters do not have to check most species of wildlife and fish, but field checks by agents show that most people follow the rules. "Conservation agents are there to investigate those who don't," he said.
One problem that surfaced with Telecheck was that a significant number of hunters did not understand that they needed to put the large portion of their tag on deer after Telechecking them. Taking into account that the procedure is still unfamiliar to hunters, agents only wrote citations where they believed there was clear intent to break the law.
Another problem involved the automated voice-recognition system used for the telephone portion of the Telecheck system. Some hunters could not complete the process because of poor connections. Others found that the system did not recognize their pronunciation of certain county names, such as De Kalb.
The Conservation Department had anticipated such problems and maintained a Telecheck Help Center staffed by department employees during Telecheck hours throughout the firearms deer season. Any hunter who had difficulty with the voice-recognition system immediately had a live person on the line to help them finish checking their deer.
"We made sure we had enough volunteer operators on hand so no one ever had to wait on hold after hitting a glitch in the system," said Doug Young, technology chief for the Conservation Department in Jefferson City. "Several people commented on that. They were surprised when they didn't have to wait for service."
Young said his office is working to fine-tune the system so it works even better in the 2006 hunting season.
"Telecheck isn't a success if it isn't easy for hunters to use," he said. "Top-quality customer service is absolutely critical if this is going to be an effective, efficient part of the agency's deer-management program."
-Jim Low-
The threat will continue until Missouri's long-term weather pattern changes.
JEFFERSON CITY-Small amounts of scattered rain and snow over the past week have temporarily lowered the fire danger facing Missouri, but officials with the Missouri Department of Conservation say the state remains vulnerable to wildfires.
The southwestern quarter of the state experienced a rash of fires in early to mid-January. Those fires mainly affected forest and pasture lands. The Conservation Department received no reports of human injuries, although some structures were damaged or destroyed.
Forestry Regional Supervisor Duane Parker said southwestern Missouri was the first place where fires flared up because that area is in a year-long drought. He said precipitation was 10 inches or more below average during 2005.
"Not only were we behind on rain last year, we continue to have dry weather," said Parker. "There has been almost no snow or prolonged rain events, which normally helps us out at this time of year."
Parker said snow is better than rain for reducing the risk of fire, because it covers grass, leaves and other potential fuels with a damp blanket, allowing it to absorb moisture. Heavy snow compresses leaves and grass, making them less fire-prone, and they soak up more water as snow melts and slowly percolates into the ground than they do during heavy rain, when most of the water runs off.
Long-range weather projections call for a moderate drought in southwest Missouri in the coming months and average precipitation in the rest of the state.
"It is going to take precipitation spread out over several days so it can soak in to change the long-term fire outlook," said Parker. "A little here and there helps for a short time, but all it takes is a few warm, breezy days and we are right back where we started."
Parker said the way this year is shaping up reminds him of 1980, when a hot, dry summer followed an unusually dry winter. That year, thousands of acres of forest and pasture land burned, with extensive loss of property.
A strong public response has helped keep fires to a minimum this year, but continued care is critical.
"Until this weather pattern changes, people need to be extremely cautious about things that can start fires," said Parker. "Frequent causes of fires this year have been careless debris burning and dumping ashes from wood stoves or fireplaces. Embers can smolder in ashes for days. The only safe way to dispose of ashes is to put them in a metal can and leave them there for several days, until they are dead out and the can is cool, or flood the can with water and stir until dead out."
Parker offered the following recommendations to avoid starting a wildfire accidentally: --If you must burn, pick an overcast day when winds are calm and the humidity is high.
--Notify local fire officials when you intend to burn.
--Burn before 10 a.m. or after 4 p.m.
--Keep water, rakes and other firefighting tools at hand.
--Call fire officials immediately if a fire escapes.
--After burning, check several times to ensure the fire is out.
--Ask your neighbors not to burn on dry, windy days.
--Educate your children to be safe with fire.
--Don't burn brush piles. They provide important wildlife habitat and decay naturally in two to five years.
-Jim Low-
Archers were the only group of Missouri deer hunters who topped the previous year's harvest figure.
JEFFERSON CITY-Missouri archers killed 37,036 deer during the 2005-06 archery deer hunting season, falling a little short of last year's record archery harvest.
Missouri's archery deer season opens Sept. 15 and runs through Jan. 15, closing only during the 11-day November portion of firearms deer season. Every other segment of Missouri's 2005-06 deer hunting season saw a larger decrease in the number of deer killed. Firearms deer hunters killed 9.1 percent fewer deer than in 2004, compared to a decrease of 1.6 percent for archers.
Biologists with the Missouri Department of Conservation attributed the decreases mainly to an abundance of acorns, which made deer less mobile and less visible to hunters.
With 112 days to hunt, archers persevered and killed just 610 fewer deer than in the 2004-2005 archery deer season. Missouri's top three archery deer harvest counties were Boone, with 874 deer checked, St. Louis, with 862 and Callaway, with 760.
Firearms deer harvest figures were:
--Urban portion, 1,833 (down 122 from 2004),
--Youth portion 10,577 (down 2,889),
--November portion 205,460 (down 17,869),
--Muzzleloader portion 10,115 (down 1,823),
--Antlerless portion 21,922 (down 2,295).
With archery kills included, Missouri's total 2005-06 deer harvest was 286,943. That is down 25,930 or 8.3 percent from the previous year's record harvest of 312,873.
-Jim Low-
Hunters killed a larger percentage of does and more deer with 8-point or bigger racks than last year.
JEFFERSON CITY-After the second year of restrictions on the harvest of antlered deer in some counties, Missouri's top deer expert says the experiment is working as planned. The change doesn't seem to be cutting into the number of deer taken, either.
After holding meetings around the state in 2003 to learn hunters' preferences, the Missouri Conservation Commission set up an experimental trial of antler-point restrictions. The new rules, which went into effect in 29 northwestern and central Missouri counties in 2004, prohibited shooting antlered deer unless they had at least 4 points on one side.
Male deer, commonly called bucks, must have antlers at least 3 inches long to be considered "antlered" under statewide hunting regulations. Most 1.5-year-old bucks have antlers 3 inches or larger. Few bucks less than 2.5 years old grow antlers with 4 points on a side, so the experimental regulation protects 1.5- to 2.5-year-old deer.
The primary purpose of the experimental, antler-based harvest regulation was to encourage hunters to take more female deer, providing more effective deer-population control. If the experimental regulation worked as planned, it also would increase the number of deer 2.5 years and older, which are more likely to have large antlers.
Resource Scientist Lonnie Hansen said this year's deer harvest data provide the first glimpse of how the experiment is working.
"We saw an increase in antlerless deer harvest in some of the experimental counties in 2004," said Hansen. "That is just what we wanted. We also saw a large decrease in the number of 1 ½-year-old bucks harvested throughout the area where the antler restrictions have been in effect."
Hansen said 2005 is the first year when the experimental regulation's effect on buck numbers and size could be seen. The number of antlered deer taken in the experimental area was up 13 percent this year. The number of antlered deer taken in surrounding counties designated as "controls" in the ongoing study was down 3 percent. The number of 2.5-year-old bucks taken in the pilot area increased 20 percent, compared to a 6 percent increase in control counties.
"It appears we gained some 2.5 year olds as expected, causing an overall increase in buck harvest in the antler-restriction counties," Hansen said. "This suggests that, as hoped, there were more 2.5-year-old-plus bucks this year. At least some of the bucks protected last year survived and were harvested this year."
As the experiment continues, Hansen expects to learn more about how antler-based harvest restrictions affect deer numbers and the survival of bucks past 1.5 years.
The experimental antler restrictions do not appear to be affecting the number of deer killed in the trial area. The total harvest in that area was down about 3 percent compared to the previous year, while the harvest in adjacent counties was down 7 percent. The statewide firearms deer harvest was down approximately 9 percent. The Conservation Department attributed the smaller statewide deer harvest to abundant acorns, which made deer less active and less available to hunters.
"The hunters I have talked with in northern Missouri seem pleased by this year's results," said Hansen. "Some hunters in the northern part of the state are asking that we extend the antler restrictions to their areas."
He said he expects the experimental antler point restrictions to continue to gain popularity in northern Missouri. However, in southern Missouri, where deer are less abundant, hunters are understandably more reluctant to welcome regulation changes that could ultimately decrease deer numbers.
"We want to take this slowly," said Hansen. "We plan to watch carefully to see how this experimental regulation affects deer numbers and listen to hunters in different parts of the state so we know how they feel about it. Our ultimate goal is to maintain or even enhance deer hunting opportunities while ensuring that we can control deer numbers in areas where they are a problem."
-Jim Low-
Women, who are more likely than men to hunt deer primarily for food, make up an increasing percentage of deer hunters.
JEFFERSON CITY-Deer hunters are changing, and biologists with responsibility for controlling Missouri's deer population like the change. They say the demographic shift promises more venison on tables and fewer dents in automobile fenders.
Permit sales statistics from the Missouri Department of Conservation show that women made up about 8 percent of deer hunters in 1996. By 2004, they made up 11 percent of the deer-hunting public. Last year, women accounted for 14 percent of deer-hunting permit sales.
"As deer become more abundant and the chances of success increase, we are seeing more and more women enter the sport," said Resource Scientist Lonnie Hansen. "That is a very encouraging trend for someone in my line of work."
In the past, deer hunting was an almost exclusively male activity. Hansen said that in recent years he and other deer managers have been concerned about the fact that deer hunters as a group were aging.
"We know from surveys and harvest statistics that older hunters are less likely than young ones to shoot deer," Hansen said. "That is probably due in part to younger hunters being more active than older ones. Also, the longer hunters take part in this sport, the more likely they are to find satisfaction in the camaraderie and in the hunt itself. Shooting a deer becomes less and less necessary for them to enjoy their outdoor experience."
Biologists like Hansen, who rely on hunters to keep deer numbers in check, worry about anything that makes deer hunters less effective at thinning the deer herd. But Hansen finds encouragement in the fact that more women are entering the sport.
In surveys, women are much more likely than men to say they hunt primarily for food, rather than for trophy animals. Furthermore, women are most likely to say they hunt in order to spend time with friends and family. That means women are likely to accept invitations to hunt with husbands, boyfriends, fathers or brothers.
Male and female hunters are alike in one respect. Women are much more interested in hunting deer than other game species. Eighty-four percent of female hunters contacted in a survey commissioned by the National Wild Turkey Federation said they hunt deer.
"All that is music to my ears," said Hansen. "We need hunters to ensure that we can continue to manage deer effectively, and hunters whose primary interest is in food are much more likely to harvest does. That's what it takes to control deer numbers."
For more information about women hunters, visit www.nwtf.org.
-Jim Low-
| Trees need water in the winter as much as in the summer. The key to winter watering is not to overdo it. (Missouri Dept. of Conservation photo) |
Whether your goal is personal fulfillment or financial gain, the Conservation Department has a wildlife management class for you.
JEFFERSON CITY-Nuts-and-bolts knowledge about how to manage land for wildlife is the focus of two workshop series to be offered at locations around Missouri this spring. One series is aimed at producing citizen "Master Conservationists." The goal of the other series is to train a cadre of wildlife contractors to provide services to private landowners.
The Missouri Department of Conservation is working with the University of Missouri School of Natural Resources, the MU Extension Service and the Missouri Agricultural Industries Council (MO-AG) to produce the two training series. Both programs will include instruction by conservation professionals and field work.
The Missouri Master Wildlifer Program will consist of a series of eight sessions, each focusing on a wildlife species or type of habitat. They will be taught live at the University of Missouri-Columbia and beamed live via interactive television simulcast to satellite training sites around the state.
The Conservation Contractor Training will consist of a series of eight workshops, each taught at a different location around the state. Each will include a classroom session and an outdoor field exercise or demonstration. Participants will receive a printed packet summarizing each portion of the series. The full set of packets will make up a comprehensive training manual for the program.
Matt Seek, who is coordinating the Master Wildlifer Program for the Conservation Department, said the purpose of the program is to help landowners who want to include wildlife in managing their farm or forest land.
Participants will receive student manuals and supplemental materials.
Brad McCord is the Conservation Department’s Conservation Contractor Training coordinator. He said that program is not intended to produce professional field biologists. Rather, it is aimed at giving private agricultural contractors enough familiarity with wildlife management terminology and practices to enable them to deliver services to clients and help them take advantage of state and federal programs that make conservation practices affordable.
"There are real opportunities for individuals to make money by making conservation happen on private land," said McCord. "Wildlife Biologists with state and federal agencies work hard to develop plans for landowners but the real shortage is knowledgeable contractors to help landowners implement approved plans. There is certainly an opportunity for contractors to benefit from Federal Farm Bill programs and other conservation incentive programs. There is no reason why people who have the equipment and the know-how can’t turn that fact to their advantage."
The first Master Wildlifer session will cover basic wildlife management principles. Subsequent classes will cover the following topics:
--Managing grassland/prairies for bobwhite quail and grassland birds.
--Managing forests for deer and turkey.
--Managing wetlands for waterfowl.
--Managing furbearers and controlling wildlife damage.
--Managing ponds and streams.
--Enhancing wildlife diversity and improving wildlife recreation.
The classes will be offered Feb. 28 and March 2, 7, 9, 14, 16, 21 and 23. Cities where the classes will be offered and contact information for details about each are:
--Reed Springs, (417) 272-8707
--Carrollton, (660) 542-1792
--Salem, (573) 729-8163
--Nevada, (417) 448-1212
--Kirksville, (660) 785-2530
--Cape Girardeau/Jackson, (573) 243-3581
--Columbia, (573) 445-9792
--St. Joseph, (816) 279-6064.
Those who attend at least seven of the eight sessions will earn the title "Master Wildlifer." For more information on the program and topics, contact Bob Pierce, (573) 882-4337, piercer@missouri.edu or Matt Seek (573) 522-4115, ext. 3288, Matt.Seek@mdc.mo.gov.
Conservation Contractor Training sessions are scheduled for:
--Feb. 16 in Cape Girardeau
--Feb. 21 in Springfield
--Feb. 23 in Clinton
--Feb. 28 in West Plains
--March 3 in Jefferson City
--March 7 in St. Louis
--March 14 in Cameron
--March 16 in Macon.
Pre-registration is required. For more information, call MO-AG, (573) 636-6130 or the Conservation Department’s Private Land Services Division, (573) 751-4115.
-Jim Low-
Last year, a stroke kept Don Walker from hunting quail as much as he wanted. This year it was a deteriorating ankle. But he has high hopes for 2006.
NIXA, Mo.-2004 and 2005 have not been high points in Don Walker's 68-year quail-hunting career. Still, he is sharp of mind, young at heart and determined as ever that 2006 will be better, for him personally and for quail in his beloved southwest Missouri hills
Walker's long-running love affair with the bobwhite quail was chronicled in these pages a year ago as he toughed out the waning days of the 2004-2005 quail season. He suffered a stroke early in the season, and with only limited control of his right leg, he wasn't able to hunt on Jan. 15, the last day of quail season.
That was a bitter pill for a man who has hunted on every opening day and most closing days of Missouri's quail season since he was 8 years old. He didn't let it get him down, though. Instead, he vowed to get his balky leg back under control and come back with renewed zeal in 2005. He succeeded with the first part of his resolution, only to be thwarted by circumstances again.
Walker went afield on Nov. 1 this year with the sawed-off, rusted and dinged Remington Model 11 scattergun he has carried since he bought it used at age 13. In doing so, he preserved his 68-year string of quail season openers. He even had his right leg whipped back into shape for the event. But every step brought grinding pain from his right ankle, which he injured years ago in a horseback riding accident. The joint has deteriorated to the point where walking on uneven ground is agony.
"The danged thing hurts so bad I can't hardly stand it," he admitted with a grimace. "I can't follow the dogs the way I used to, so I follow them in my pickup and get out when they get on a point."
That is a far cry from his preferred approach, but still better than nothing. If the dog work is good and his hunting companions get some shooting, it is a successful day for Walker. That was the case on a recent hunt with Phil Fels, co-founder of the Ozark Plateau Chapter of Quail Forever.
Fels brought a young Llewellin setter to learn from two of Walker's dogs, an English setter named DeeDee and a pointer pup named Josh. A veteran like her master, DeeDee managed to find birds in thickets of blackberry and sumac that filled every hollow on a 445-acre farm in Douglas County.
The work was complicated by a cold snap that kept the temperature in the low 20s and the quail in their sheltered nighttime roosting spots until practically noon. When the blackberry thorns caused her tail to stream blood, Walker gave her a well-earned rest and let Josh take her place.
Bad ankle or not, Walker was not going to miss all the action. He parked his truck at the bottom of one perennially productive hollow and hiked and hobbled his way to the top, only occasionally leaning on his shotgun or a companion's shoulder. Along the way, he shouted encouragement to his four-legged protégé.
"Come on, Josh. God-dang it, I want birds!"
And Josh did find birds in that draw, just as Walker knew he would. The birds, however, refused to play by the rules and flushed before the dogs pointed. The shooting was haphazard and mostly ineffective. Nevertheless, it was a moment to savor for a quail aficionado who, after nearly 70 years and thousands of bagged birds, still grins broadly at every covey rise.
The size of the bag for the 90-minute hunt-three quail-in no way reflected the importance of the event in Walker's eyes. Seeing two coveys of 10 to 20 quail each added new fuel to the fire of his hunting zeal.
"I'm going to get this ankle fixed after this season is over," he said. "The doctor says I'll be in a cast for a month or two, but that's okay. I want to be able to get after 'em next year."
After his hunt with Fels, Walker vowed to join Quail Forever, and was receptive to the idea of partnering with the group to improve quail habitat on his land.
"I've hunted everything in the U.S.," said Walker, "and bobwhites and dogs to me is the best. We need to help the Conservation and Quail Forever to increase quail for future hunters. Somebody's got to do something, otherwise, we won't have any quail at all before long."
-Jim Low-