The Nodaway River basin plan was developed to address objectives provided in the Missouri Department of Conservation Strategic Plan, Fisheries Division Operational Plan (FY 1996-2000), Stream Areas Program Plan, and the Stream Access Acquisition Plan. These plans indicate areas of future expanded resource management, public awareness, and access needs. Major areas of concern in the Nodaway River basin include water quality, riparian and aquatic habitat, aquatic communities, and recreational use. All goals are of equal importance, however, objectives are listed in order of priority under each goal. This plan only includes those items that the Missouri Department of Conservation can reasonably attain or influence during the next 25 years. Completion of these objectives will depend upon their status in overall Regional and Divisional priorities, as well as the availability of personnel and funds.

GOAL 1: IMPROVE WATER QUALITY AND MAINTAIN OR IMPROVE WATER QUANTITY IN THE NODAWAY RIVER BASIN SO THAT ALL STREAMS ARE CAPABLE OF SUPPORTING NATIVE AQUATIC COMMUNITIES.

Status: Streams within the Nodaway River basin suffer from several water quality problems associated with point and non-point source pollution. Turbidity and sedimentation from erosion, and animal waste from livestock operations are non-point sources of pollution in the basin. Sewage effluent from several waste water treatment facilities is the primary point source pollutant. The Conservation Reserve Program (CRP) has reduced the acreage of highly erodible soil that once was in row crop production. However, most contracts will expire by 1998, and this could result in CRP lands reverting back to row crop production. In addition, there is increased interest in construction of concentrated animal feeding operations that could result in an increase in livestock waste runoff.

Objective 1.1

Water quality standards are met in all streams within the basin.

Strategy: Enforcing existing state and federal water quality regulations will help reduce the number of violations that occur. Providing assistance in gathering additional water quality data within the basin will provide more information about stream conditions throughout the entire basin. This information can be used to provide justification for further protection and increased enforcement.

Objective 1.2

Maintain base flows within the Nodaway River basin at or above current levels within the constraints imposed by natural seasonal variations in precipitation.

Strategy: Work closely with agricultural agencies to address concerns related to adequate streamflows within the basin. Work with state and local governments on laws and regulations pertaining to maintenance of base flows.

GOAL 2: IMPROVE OR MAINTAIN RIPARIAN AND AQUATIC HABITATS IN THE NODAWAY RIVER BASIN.

Status: Channelization and levees negatively affect riparian and aquatic habitats through increased stream bed and bank erosion, sedimentation, and by reducing wooded corridors, instream cover, and pool/riffle habitat complexes. Due to past channelization, many stream channels have down-cut below the root systems of trees so that the few trees remaining provide little, if any, streambank stabilization. In addition, landowners in the basin are reluctant to restore 100 feet wide vegetated corridors along each streambank because of the loss in row crop acreage.

Objective 2.1

Oppose most proposed channelization, re-channelization, or levee construction projects within the Nodaway River basin.

Strategy: Preventing future channel alterations will require a combination of watchdog activities that encourage enforcement of current laws, and educational programs. If these activities work, the need for law enforcement action in the future will be reduced.

Objective 2.2

Inform landowners within the Nodaway River basin about good stream stewardship practices and the importance of riparian corridors. Efforts to maintain and improve riparian conditions will be concentrated along the lower eleven miles of the mainstem Nodaway, Florida Creek, Nichols Creek, and Smith Creek, that were identified as possessing the best habitat within the Nodaway River basin in Missouri.

Strategy: Advertising and promoting stream incentive programs, installing and maintaining demonstration projects, and providing educational opportunities regarding stream stewardship will allow landowners to be more aware of the reasons and techniques for protecting streams. Promoting stream incentive programs for improving riparian habitats will likely encourage more landowners to participate. The majority of the Nodaway River basin is in Iowa, so technical assistance will be limited and will have to be directed at certain select segments of the basin in Missouri. Time and resources will have to be focused where the most benefit to the basin in Missouri is likely.

GOAL 3: MAINTAIN DIVERSE AND ABUNDANT POPULATIONS OF NATIVE AQUATIC ORGANISMS WHILE SUPPORTING ANGLER DEMANDS FOR QUALITY FISHING.

Status: A comprehensive survey of the fishes inhabiting the Nodaway River basin is needed in unsampled, or inadequately sampled streams. Several species of fish desirable to anglers are found in the basin. Channel and flathead catfish are the most sought after species, but sufficient samples to assess their populations are lacking. Very limited invertebrate sampling has been conducted, and a comprehensive study across the basin has not been conducted.

Objective 3.1

Assess and maintain native non-game fish populations and aquatic invertebrates at or above present levels throughout the basin.

Strategy: Assess the status of fish and invertebrate communities throughout the basin through a cooperative effort between MDNR, MDC, Iowa DNR, Iowa county conservation boards, Missouri Western State College, and Northwest Missouri State University. Achieving habitat objectives within the basin should ensure maintenance and improvement of aquatic communities. To determine if there are changes in aquatic communities within the basin, periodic surveys will need to be conducted with directed effort toward collecting indicator species (species sensitive to poor water quality) within the basin.

Objective 3.2

Evaluate sportfish populations within basin streams and provide recommendations for maintenance and improvement of these populations to a level that satisfies the angling public.

Strategy: Assess the quality of sportfish populations and provide recommendations for the enhancement of populations through regulations, habitat improvement, or stocking. A creel survey to determine angler use, harvest, and attitudes should be done in the Nodaway basin. This information would be of utility in managing sportfish populations, and it would provide guidance for future management within the basin.

GOAL 4: INCREASE PUBLIC APPRECIATION FOR STREAM RESOURCES IN THE NODAWAY RIVER BASIN.

Status: Most citizens in the region lack an understanding and appreciation for the importance of stream resources. There is little regard for the well-being of streams within the basin.

Objective 4.1

Increase the level of public understanding of local stream resources and proper stream management practices.

Strategy: Increasing public awareness and knowledge of stream values should result in improvements in the level of appreciation for local stream resources. Enhanced awareness of streams within the basin should result in heightened concern about stream quality.

GOAL 5: INCREASE RECREATIONAL USE OF STREAMS IN THE NODAWAY RIVER BASIN.

Status: Turbid water, steep banks, straight channels, intensively farmed land, and limited access combine to limit recreation associated with basin streams. The Nodaway River is not floatable at certain times due to low flows and this also discourages visitation. Small scenic areas are found in the basin, and with restoration of wooded corridors, increased public awareness, and better access, increases in use should be possible.

Objective 5.1

Increase recreational opportunities on and along streams within the basin.

Strategy: The MDC strategic plan calls for an increase in stream use to accommodate an overall increase in the level of use as construction of new reservoirs declines. Public satisfaction with existing recreational opportunities associated with streams in the basin needs to be determined. In addition, future acquisition sites, facilities, and recreational opportunities should be identified.

Objective 5.2

Recreationists have access to information on stream use opportunities in the basin.

Strategy: The public may not be aware of the recreational opportunities that currently exist in the basin. Publicity should increase use of basin streams. This in turn could lead to increased appreciation of the resource and foster the opinion that Nodaway River basin streams are worth protecting.