|
Most
Missouri streams meander as they move down the valley.
They show two basic habitat types: pools and riffles. Good pools
are deep, slow moving and provide fish with cover and resting
areas. Riffles are shallow, with a faster flow. They are feeding
and spawning areas. Riffles are shallow, with a faster flow.
They are feeding and spawning areas. This is the natural way
in which water flows through Missouri streams.
Meanders, which are often called bends, are constantly changing
because the force of the water moving around the bends removes
soil and gravel from the bank and deposits it on an inside bend
downstream. Channels develop over a long period of time and relatively
small amounts of bank erosion occur during each flood.
But when a major change is made to any part of the stream
system the channel must adjust and becomes unstable. We often
see these adjustments in the form of severe bank erosion, large
deposits of gravel or erosion of bottomland fields.
Shaping stream channels is often seen as a solution, but it
usually causes more problems than it solves. Straightening stream
channels, pushing gravel against eroding banks, removing gravel
from the stream and dumping old cars and debris on banks are
some of the ineffective things people do.
Channelization, or stream straightening, seems logical because
the eroding bends are totally removed. however, the removal of
the bends shortens the length of the channel, making it steeper
than the original channel. Water flows faster causing the banks
and bottom to erode. Additional erosion will result as the stream
takes years to re-establish its natural meandering pattern.
Pushing gravel against eroding banks is a short-lived solution
because the flood waters will eventually move the gravel downstream
and the bank will again be exposed to erosion. Fish are hurt
by sediment that clogs their gills and destroys their spawning
habitat. Also, the stable stream bottom is disrupted and left
exposed to erosion.
Too much gravel in streams can cause problems, but in most
cases, not enough can be removed to have a meaningful effect
on stream stability. Efforts should be directed at good watershed
management to stop the influx of gravel.
Car bodies and other debris, dumped on the stream bank, do
not work to stabilize the bank. Unlike tree roots, junk cannot
hold the soil. Nor can junk armor the soil like a blanket of
large stone. Besides being ineffective this method is ugly and
causes pollution.
I have written about the need to protect our streams and the
reasons for including the watershed, floodplain and stream corridor
in this effort. But how do we do this? Where do we start and
who is responsible for properly managing the components of a
stream system?
First, remember we all live in a a watershed so we are all
responsible. Whether we are city dwellers, suburbanites or farmers
we can all change things by the way we manage the land. We can
change the land we own, and we can ask our local governments
to require good land management by the public, developers and
their own employees.
Return to List
|