A Tale of Two Watersheds

This content is archived

Published on: Mar. 2, 2007

Last revision: Nov. 30, 2010

member. The committee helped develop a cost-share program based on local needs, and goals were developed based on priorities identified with Agricultural Non Point Source (AgNPS) computer modeling.

Richard McConnell became project manager in 1997 and was instrumental in reaching the watershed goals for Brush Creek. However, he credits the committee for the overall success of the project. Committee members have the respect of their neighbors and they know the local issues. They know which projects will work best for themselves and their area.

McConnell has worked more than eight years as a project manager in southwest Missouri. He spent four of those years working on Brush Creek, and he has since worked on projects at Bear Creek and Hominy Creek. On all three projects, he said he has benefited from helpful landowner committees and the flexible support of numerous partners.

Little Bourbeuse/Brush Creek

The Little Bourbeuse and Brush Creek watersheds are located primarily in Crawford County, with small portions in Franklin and Gasconade counties. These two watersheds became a priority in 2002 when the Fish and Wildlife Service listed the scaleshell mussel as an endangered species in the Bourbeuse River. Native mussels are the most endangered species in the rivers and streams of Missouri.

Because Little Bourbeuse River and Brush Creek drain to the Bourbeuse River, one goal of the project was to improve their water quality.

Another team effort

The Little Bourbeuse/Brush Creek Watershed Advisory Committee was made up of five landowners. Two were chosen from the Crawford County Soil and Water Conservation District Board, three lived in the priority watersheds. The group also included technical staff from the Department of Conservation and the Department of Natural Resources. The role of the committee was to put control and decision-making in the hands of the landowners. Members were asked to recommend new practices and to take the lead in seeking additional funding. Agency staffs tracked projects and funds.

Funding was provided through partners and a flexible cost-share program. Partners included the National Fish and Wildlife Foundation, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Department of Conservation, county Soil and Water Conservation Districts, Farm Services Agency and Missouri Conservation Heritage Foundation. Technical assistance was also available from these agencies plus the Natural Resources Conservation Service and the Meramec Regional Planning Commission.

Just like the Brush Creek project in southwest Missouri, money and technical assistance were made available to improve farms while protecting the Little Bourbeuse/Brush Creek watersheds. There was one slight difference, though. The cost-share rate was higher than usual as an incentive for landowners to quickly obligate money for projects.

All of the money was obligated in two months, and projects were quickly completed. Even though cost-share rates were high, each contributor got more “bang for their buck” since there were multiple partners to help pay for each practice.

Getting the word out

Landowner pride and willingness to demonstrate successful practices made a huge impact across the area. For example, two farm tours were held in the Little Bourbeuse watershed on the property of C. Dale and Emma Murphy. Neighbors were invited to see and hear Mr. Murphy describe practices he had used on his farm. This was a good time to socialize, talk about how to improve their farms and find out how to install GeoWeb® around livestock tanks.

Other property owners had tours of their own. When it came time to choose materials and equipment, they relied on each other. They cooperated to order livestock tanks, pipe, GeoWeb®, and erosion control fabrics to best facilitate project installations.

Local contractors learned of the watershed initiatives when they were asked for bids to install best management practices. The contractors were happy to learn that the projects were located in two small watersheds. This meant they could contract services within a small area and would not have to move equipment as far or as often. They also served as one of the means to spread the word about available funds.

The successes of the Little Bourbeuse/Brush Creek watershed project included more than 16 miles of fence installed along streams and acres of riparian corridor planted in trees.

Watershed projects that fail to meet landowner goals tend to be unsuccessful. However, as these examples show, landowner-driven projects practically sell themselves. For more information on how to improve your local watershed, contact your regional Department of Conservation office (see page 1 for a list of regional office phone numbers).

Content tagged with

Shortened URL